The robot vacuum deals are a great time to add cool tech to your smart house. Best Buy is offering a $350 discount on one of the most popular Roomba models today, making them particularly attractive. The iRobot Roomba i7+ now costs $550 at Best Buy, down from its regular $900 price. You get free shipping and in-store pickup in many locations. Wait times are as short as one hour.
Why the iRobot Roomba i7+ is a great choice
The Roomba name is perhaps the most well-known in robot vacuums. It seems to always be among the top models. The Roomba i7+ is one of iRobot’s higher end Roomba models, as it possesses superior cleaning power and some of the best smarts you’ll find in a robot vacuum. The iRobot Roomba i7+ is able to empty itself after reaching capacity, which is one of its strengths. This happens after the Roomba is done cleaning itself with its premium three stage cleaning system that provides 10 times the suction as other Roombas.
Among the Roomba i7+’s smart features is smart mapping, which allows it to learn the layout of your home, and makes it standard operating procedure for the i7+ to build personal smart maps and clean in neat, efficient rows. This also gives it the brain power to know where to go when you give it a certain command, such as “cleaning under the kitchen table,” or “cleaning the living room.” Smart scheduling features make this robot vacuum a nice option for houses with kids and pets, as the Roomba i7+ can get to work regularly on little messes that occur throughout the day.
While the iRobot Rooma i7+ would regularly cost $900, it’s just $550 at Best Buy today. This saves you $350 and includes free shipping. This offer is only available for a limited time, so make sure to visit Best Buy right away to take advantage of this deal.
Today’s tech news curated and condensed to your inbox
Check your inbox!
To continue, please provide a valid email address.
This email address is currently stored. If you do not receive newsletters, please check your spam mailbox.
An error occurred during subscription Please try again later.
Recommendations from editors